On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Dan Poirier <[email protected]> wrote: > Suppose we just make _default_ a synonym of * in virtual host hostnames?
+1, I still never found a practical purpose for two wildcards. I tend to think of having only one kind of vhost that undergoes ip-based selection, then optionally further selection based on name, if the best addr:port match landed on a string that matches a configured NVH directive. The only config I am aware of broken by this is something degenerate with "NVH _default_:80" and overlapping *:80 or _default_:80 where all but the first vhost are dead code today but wouldn't be with NVH *:80 -- Eric Covener [email protected]
