On 17.08.2010 16:43, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Tue Aug 17 14:43:45 2010
New Revision: 986333

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=986333&view=rev
Log:
Further checks for non-body requests...

Modified:
     httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c

Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c?rev=986333&r1=986332&r2=986333&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c Tue Aug 17 14:43:45 2010
@@ -704,8 +704,15 @@ int ap_proxy_http_request(apr_pool_t *p,
       * Send the HTTP/1.1 request to the remote server
       */

+    /*
+     * To be compliant, we only use 100-Continue for requests with no bodies.
+     * We also make sure we won't be talking HTTP/1.0 as well.
+     */
      do_100_continue = (worker->ping_timeout_set
                         &&  !r->header_only
+&&  !r->kept_body
+&&  !(apr_table_get(r->headers_in, "Content-Length"))
+&&  !(apr_table_get(r->headers_in, "Transfer-Encoding"))

Did you mean:

&& (!apr_table_get(r->headers_in, "Content-Length") ||
    !apr_table_get(r->headers_in, "Transfer-Encoding")

                         &&  (PROXYREQ_REVERSE == r->proxyreq)
                         &&  !(apr_table_get(r->subprocess_env, 
"force-proxy-request-1.0")));

@@ -1397,10 +1404,12 @@ apr_status_t ap_proxy_http_process_respo

      do_100_continue = (worker->ping_timeout_set
                         &&  !r->header_only
+&&  !r->kept_body
+&&  !(apr_table_get(r->headers_in, "Content-Length"))
+&&  !(apr_table_get(r->headers_in, "Transfer-Encoding"))

Same as above

                         &&  (PROXYREQ_REVERSE == r->proxyreq)
                         &&  !(apr_table_get(r->subprocess_env, 
"force-proxy-request-1.0")));

-
      bb = apr_brigade_create(p, c->bucket_alloc);
      pass_bb = apr_brigade_create(p, c->bucket_alloc);

Regards,

Rainer

Reply via email to