On 24 Aug 2010, at 12:13, [email protected] wrote: > Author: trawick > Date: Tue Aug 24 11:13:14 2010 > New Revision: 988483 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=988483&view=rev > Log: > fix some bogus rev numbers pointed out by niq
My +1 for the 2.2.x patch stands - which is what matters. However: > + http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=986090&view=rev looks to me like another bogus rev: it's not part of this backport proposal and I haven't reviewed it. -- Nick Kew
