On Sep 16, 2010, at 5:53 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:

> On 16 Sep 2010, at 9:13 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> 
>>> +static apr_status_t file_cache_create(disk_cache_conf *conf, 
>>> disk_cache_file_t *file,
>>> +                                      apr_pool_t *pool)
>>> +{
>>> +    file->pool = pool;
>>> +    file->tempfile = apr_pstrcat(pool, conf->cache_root, AP_TEMPFILE, 
>>> NULL);
>>> +
>>> +    apr_pool_cleanup_register(pool, file, file_cache_temp_cleanup, 
>>> file_cache_temp_cleanup);
>> 
>> Is this correct? Do we want to call file_cache_temp_cleanup when we get 
>> forked?
> 
> I don't follow, when you we fork during normal request handling?
> 

Well, we don't but who knows what other modules may do... :/

Reply via email to