On Sep 16, 2010, at 5:53 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 16 Sep 2010, at 9:13 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>>> +static apr_status_t file_cache_create(disk_cache_conf *conf,
>>> disk_cache_file_t *file,
>>> + apr_pool_t *pool)
>>> +{
>>> + file->pool = pool;
>>> + file->tempfile = apr_pstrcat(pool, conf->cache_root, AP_TEMPFILE,
>>> NULL);
>>> +
>>> + apr_pool_cleanup_register(pool, file, file_cache_temp_cleanup,
>>> file_cache_temp_cleanup);
>>
>> Is this correct? Do we want to call file_cache_temp_cleanup when we get
>> forked?
>
> I don't follow, when you we fork during normal request handling?
>
Well, we don't but who knows what other modules may do... :/