________________________________

        From: Jeff Trawick Sent: Donnerstag, 23. September 2010 14:17
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: svn commit: r1000130 - 
/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml
        
        
        On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:11 AM, "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group"  wrote:
        

                 


________________________________

                        From: Jeff Trawick Sent: Donnerstag, 23. September 2010 
12:05
                        To: [email protected]
                        Subject: Re: svn commit: r1000130 - 
/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml
                        
                        
                        On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:03 AM, Ruediger Pluem  wrote:

                        first, thanks for stepping in!
                        




                                > ttl is the only timeout avail, so that has to 
be set to the origin's
                                > keepalive timeout
                                > ttl only applies to connections above smax, 
so smax needs to be set as low
                                > as allowable
                                
                                
                                No. ttl is absolute. The resource list hands 
out no resources that have been
                                idle in the resource list for more then ttl. So 
no need to fiddle with
                                smax.
                                


                        I have a hard time believing both that and the 
apr_reslist_create() doc.  ttl is passed only to apr_reslist_create(), which 
says

                        " * @param ttl If non-zero, sets the maximum amount of 
time in microseconds a
                         *            resource may be available while exceeding 
the soft limit."

                        That seems to say that I can get resources that have 
been idle for more than ttl, as long as the soft limit wasn't exceeded. 
                         
                        The docs are just wrong. You will see that code does 
something different :-)


        Yeah (this is getting almost comical).
        
        doc patch/wild assertions posted to d...@apr
        
        So far it seems that min is almost useless for proxy due to the loose 
relationship between reslist resource and connection (and thus shouldn't be 
emphasized at all), and smax is almost useless for any apr_reslist client, 
including proxy (and like min, it shouldn't be emphasized at all in the proxy 
doc).
        
         
        +1
         
        Regards
         
        Rüdiger 
         
         

Reply via email to