On 9/24/2010 11:12 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > I guess I'm also missing the bigger picture, but: > > - at first sight it sounds very reasonable to provide the LD_LIBRARY_PATH as > well > > - it might result in problems, if the binary to start uses system libs, which > exist in > LD_LIBRARY_PATH and in system default locations in incompatible versions. > IMHO this is > more a theoretical problem. E.g. the apr libs are versioned via the soname > such that the > runtime linker won't link against a wrong version.
But these same problems would be true at the shell, prior to invoking httpd, no?
