On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Nick Kew wrote: > Good stuff, and motivated me to get around to r1002415 :)
Nice :) > But shouldn't adding const-ness to an API argument call for an MMN > bump? I guess it doesn't matter to a caller, but might it affect a > compiler? I wasn't aware that this could make a difference to the compiler. But looking at it again, I think it would make sense to change the "int *was_error" parameters into "const char **errstring" and return a useful error string there (or NULL if there was no error).
