On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Nick Kew wrote: > It's been sitting in my to-do list to review mod_ssl's expression > parser, and see if we can't substitute ap_expr - with updates to > the latter if necessary. > > Any thoughts on whether that would work based on your look at it?
From a technical point of view I see no reason why it would not work. But it would mean to either make the syntax of ap_expr match exactly the syntax of ssl_expr or to break backward compatibility in SSLRequire. I am not sure either makes sense. Maybe it would be better to keep both in 2.4 and throw out ssl_expr in 3.0?
