On 23 Oct 2010, at 9:51 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ struct proxy_worker {
apr_port_t port;
char keepalive;
char disablereuse;
- int is_address_reusable;
+ int is_address_reusable:1;
proxy_conn_pool *cp; /* Connection pool to use */
proxy_worker_stat *s; /* Shared data */
void *opaque; /* per scheme worker data */
No; this is a dis-optimization. You have added int-bitmath cpu cycles
to a simple int test, without gaining any storage. Huh?
Are you sure?
I would expect a compiler optimiser to do the most appropriate thing,
and it gets us out of the habit of allocating an int or a char every
time we need a boolean flag.
Regards,
Graham
--
