On Nov 28, 2010, at 9:38 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Igor Galić wrote:
There's a PR, over three years old now:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42000
complaining about the accuracy of the debugging documentation.
Taking a look at it, I found that s/POOL_DEBUG/APR_POOL_DEBUG/
is an easy fix, but as far as the rest goes, this is near
impossible for your run-of-the-mill docs@ contributor.
Looking further, I found a number of disharmonics.
The only place ALLOC_DEBUG is referenced is in test/
Most of the stuff in there hasn't been touched since a
license header update 2006. What is test/?
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/*trunk*/developer/
Welcomes us to
``Developer Documentation for Apache *2.0*''
The first topic discusses is ``Apache *1.3* API Notes''
I particularly like http://httpd.apache.org/dev/API.html which is the
Shambhala API. Nice from a historical perspective, but makes us look
like abandonware.
Rich has linked the autogenerated doxygen reference
on his server as external resource. That's cool -
but would probably make a better picture if it was hosted
on httpd.a.o ;)
It would especially make a better picture if there was a cron job
that kept the docs up-to-date. Rich's page is somewhat out of date
by now.
Yes. It is. I didn't want to dump it wholesale into the docs before I
figured out how to auto-update it.
I could use some help on this.
I think, unfortunately, that this falls squarely on the docs team to
JFDI, although, granted, we need quite a bit of help for the twiddly
bits. I would rather have nothing, or just the auto-gen docs, than
have all this old and contradictory stuff as our only API documentation.
Additionally, there's a lot of outdated and Just Plain Wrong stuff on http://modules.apache.org/reference.php
which is hosted elsewhere. That (modules.apache.org in general) has
come up again and again, but nobody really has the time/passion to do
much about it.
--
Rich Bowen
[email protected]