On Jan 7, 2011, at 2:00 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 1/7/2011 10:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> There's a lot of cruft in 2.3/2.4 that, imo at least, doesn't >> belong in a 2011-era codebase. For example, 2.3/2.4 should >> *require* support for threads, and shared-memory and other >> such stuff that we test for and work around. > > Silly question, but before we debate such things, would you at least > define 'other such stuff' individually? > > Completely agreed on threads and shm, all binaries I build have used > these for a decade with httpd since APR 0.9. I think the 1980's OS's > are now a historical footnote. >
For right now, APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY and APR_HAS_THREADS should be dropped for 2.3/2.4. I'd be happy with that for now ;)
