On 01/07/2011 08:05 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 1/7/2011 12:49 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: >> If caution is to be exercised for other reasons, such as losing data in the >> event of a >> crash, that's a separate issue, and should be handled separately. > > It should be used with caution. Instead of arguing, replace the caution. > Or I'm happy to revert. > >
How about <note>This directive should be used with caution as a crash might cause loss of logging data.</note> or something similar. Doc's wordsmithes please chime in :-). Regards Rüdiger
