On 1/23/2011 11:49 PM, Kaspar Brand wrote: > On 23.01.2011 19:48, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> No idea what happened... I didn't do any docs change except >> for proxy, so when I redid those, the fr may have gotten >> reverted? > > Hmm, from looking at the commit message at > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1060392, perhaps > some git-svn "side effect"?
That would seem like it. It's more than a little troubling if this svn enablement is permitting committers to modify files they are unaware of modifying. Folks using svn-git, please spend some extra attention to your commit history emails for a bit here, and share your experiences especially if you discover unintended side effects similar to this? >> In any case, +1 on simply re-applying them. Agreed, and since you reverted them, it would fall upon you to do that :(
