On Jan 27, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:31:29 -0500 > Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Would it make sense in trunk to add, for symmetry, >> ap_run_pre_read_request() ? I can foresee a number of >> situations where it would be useful and now would >> be the time to add it... >> >> Unless I hear otherwise, I'll do so in a few days. > > What semantics and fingerprint are you proposing? > > Pass it a connnection and return void? Or ??? >
I was thinking passing it a ptr to the connection and the just created request_rec structure... return would be the normal OK or DECLINED. > Any obvious use cases? Is this in reaction to people > who want to use input filters to play with headers? Yes, or to setup side context wrappers around read_request.
