On Monday 07 March 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Problem: It doesn't follow the naming conventions of an aaa module. > > I don't remember if it's been renamed a few times already, but if > it behaves as authn/authz it should be named into that schema.
It behaves somewhat different in that it does not use mod_authz_core and is unaffected by mod_authz_core's inheritance/merging (which is intentional and wanted). Also, the authz provider for 'Require method' is already contained in mod_authz_core. Therefore renaming mod_allowmethods to mod_authz_method would be a bit confusing, IMHO. I am fine with the current name, but if you have a better suggestion, that's fine too.
