On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 07:08, Akins, Brian <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/14/11 7:51 PM, "Brian McCallister" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think the right path for this is to shrink the core mod_lua module >> to be the *minimal* set for integration, and pull all the higher level >> functionality into a non-core module, which uses the core mod_lua to >> hook into the server. > > +1 > > How many people actual run mod_lua (or a derivative/relative) in production? > Am I the only one on a "real" site? > > FWIW, moving more and more of the code into Lua and having only very thin > wrappers in C is a good idea as well. Plays really nicely with luajit, as > well. > > -- > Brian Akins > > >
I've been eagerly looking forward to a stable mod_lua with which to make my sites. If done well, Lua could replace PHP as the #1 web scripting language, especially if it avoided making the same mistakes (e.g. dumping everything into the global namespace with no consistent naming or parameter schemes). -- Sent from my toaster.
