On 3/28/2011 6:03 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 29 Mar 2011, at 12:10 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> I *think* we're talking the same thing here... you seem to be >> focusing on how ProxyPassReverse is currently implemented, which >> is horribly slow, but but making ProxyPass automatically handle >> the default PPR case means we don't need to use that implementation. > > What I did to handle the "slow list" case for both ProxyPass and CacheEnable > (which was > modeled on ProxyPass originally) was to teach the directive to have a > once-only > per-directory value, which takes precedence if set, but reverts to the slow > list if unset.
My suggestion isn't per-dir. It's a r->notes which is even more efficient.
