On Mar 31, 2011, at 1:32 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mar 31, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >>> >>> there is one true generation, and it is the one you implement here, >>> and shouldn't be managed by the MPM >>> >> >> Well, I agree, of course, hence the implementation. But I was >> hesitant to touch the mpm "perception" of generation, since >> that's something that's been exposed for awhile... > > It has already changed in 2.3.x in that you have to use ap_mpm_query() > to find the generation. > > I think main() just tells the MPM what the generation is and the MPM > goes about its business with minimal code changes. > ap_mpm_query(GENERATION) would still work if we choose, but we could > back that out, preferring one-true-way over making 2.3.current modules > happy. > > I'm happy to try this out in a few days. >
I haven't looked, but yeah, it might not be as all-encompasing as I think ;)
