----- Original Message ----- > On 5/20/2011 4:48 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > ONLY the -deps tarballs have been changed/updated to include > > apr-1.4.5/apu-1.3.12; Since these are provided as a service, > > I see no reason to require a whole new vote, nor to invalidate > > any votes on 2.3.12-beta proper. > > On the subject of your post, totally agree, we can wait a bit > longer for httpd-2.3.13(Win64) signatures :) Not many changes > here since beta tag. > > But here's the meta issue; how will httpd, moving forward, deal > with revisioning -deps when there is no sensible reason to have > a new httpd release?
It's been said before, and I'm talking about the moving forward part here: For 2.4 we should *drop* -deps We'll have to link to them one way or the other, but mirroring, I believe, is the wrong way. Recommending the appropriate seems more sensible to me. i -- Igor Galić Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883 Mail: [email protected] URL: http://brainsware.org/
