On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Stefan Fritsch <s...@sfritsch.de> wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > On Tuesday 26 April 2011, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> has anyone played with this before? I've seen it mentioned, and >> joe s had a patch to create a linger thread for worker back in >> 2004 >> >> the attached patch hasn't been seriously tested (or even seriously >> coded) >> >> if somebody has looked at it seriously, perhaps you can save me >> some time :) > > I have looked at limiting the maximum connections per-process for > event (see STATUS) and think that would be easier to implement if the > lingering close would be done by the listener thread. Two questions: > > Did you have a chance to work on this further? If yes, can you post > the latest version?
not yet; would love to but even better would be to have someone else take it up :) > > Is your patch based on the work by joe s? I mean if I commit something > based on your patch, should I mention him in the credit, too? not based on his work I saw Joe S's patch when looking for prior conversations on the topic; ISTR that it has a totally different implementation predating event and its particular connection state????
