On Monday 20 June 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 6/20/2011 9:07 AM, Greg Ames wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Stefan Fritsch <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > wrote: > > Speaking about config options, I think that MaxClients should > > be renamed to MaxWorkers, because it limits the number of > > worker threads, not the number of clients. As with the > > MaxRequestsPerChild -> MaxConnectionsPerChild rename, we > > would still accept the old name with a warning. Thoughts? > > > > +1. That's more accurate for sure, and more important when you > > loose the 1:1 thread:connection ratio. > > Can we call this MaxRequestWorkers, now that we have different > sorts of workers living in the same process?
Good point. Committed as r1137744
