On 21/06/2011 00:30, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Jun 20, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>> On Monday 20 June 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>>> On 6/20/2011 9:07 AM, Greg Ames wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Stefan Fritsch <[email protected]
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> Speaking about config options, I think that MaxClients should
>>>> be renamed to MaxWorkers, because it limits the number of
>>>> worker threads, not the number of clients. As with the
>>>> MaxRequestsPerChild -> MaxConnectionsPerChild rename, we
>>>> would still accept the old name with a warning. Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> +1. That's more accurate for sure, and more important when you
>>>> loose the 1:1 thread:connection ratio.
>>> Can we call this MaxRequestWorkers, now that we have different
>>> sorts of workers living in the same process?
>> Good point. Committed as r1137744
> That kind of last-minute change is going to kill people trying to
> upgrade from 2.2 to 2.4 with a shared config. We should make
> MaxRequestWorkers an alias for MaxClients in a released 2.2.x
>
> ....Roy
+1
