> I will think about a good way, how users can pass additional LDADD > flags. Putting the "-R ..." into the LDFLAGS seems to be too heavy, > because then the RPATH of every module etc. will contain the given > directory. The real problematic cases are only mod_lua and in rare > circumstances (you want to link against a non-standard zlib) > mod_deflate. It might be enough to use APR_ADDTO() instead of direct > assignment or APR_SETVAR() when setting the LDADD variables. I'll > experiment.
Using APR_ADDTO() for the MOD_XXX_LDADD worked nicely, so I used that solution to allow users to easily prefix something to our LDADD detection. > So would you also remove the current "ap_platform_runtime_link_flag" > hack, which we only use for Solaris and which adds "-R ..." > unconditional? Or should we stick, because although it is not right it > is what did work in the past (for Solaris)? Thsi question still remains open for me. Regards, Rainer
