Seems to me the macro should be AP_

+1

On Sep 7, 2011, at 12:56 PM, Eric Covener wrote:

> 
> I think it's useful, but maybe not baked into the same patch as the fix?
> 
> Just noticing -- should the macro be AP_* before it ships in 2.2.21 or
> apply_to/?
> 
> -- 
> Eric Covener
> [email protected]
> 

Reply via email to