Seems to me the macro should be AP_ +1
On Sep 7, 2011, at 12:56 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > > I think it's useful, but maybe not baked into the same patch as the fix? > > Just noticing -- should the macro be AP_* before it ships in 2.2.21 or > apply_to/? > > -- > Eric Covener > [email protected] >
