On Sep 16, 2011, at 11:59 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 9/16/2011 12:51 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote: >> IIRC, we talked about making 2.0 EOL when we make the next release, but >> I don't think we ever formalized the decision. >> >> Does anyone have comments for or against announcing 2.0 End-Of-Life at a >> set time (say 3 months) following the release of 2.4? > > Yes, I'd prefer we set a 12 month sunset on 2.0 in conjunction with the > 2.4 release, not 3 months later when nobody is paying attention.
+1. While I'd like to be rid of it earlier, I think 3 months is too fast. 12 months may be too long, but we lose nothing by setting it there rather than too short. -- Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com rbo...@apache.org
