Fixed… Thx! On Sep 27, 2011, at 3:52 AM, rpl...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rpluem > Date: Tue Sep 27 07:52:54 2011 > New Revision: 1176254 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1176254&view=rev > Log: > * Add comment > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=1176254&r1=1176253&r2=1176254&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Tue Sep 27 07:52:54 2011 > @@ -159,6 +159,15 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: > Trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1175980 > 2.2.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~jim/patches/byterange0-.txt > +1: jim > + rpluem asks: Shouldn't it be > + > + if (sum_lengths > clength) { > + > + instead of > + > + if (sum_lengths = clength) { > + > + like in trunk as otherwise we still send a 200 for 0-? > > PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED > > >
