On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:21:31 +0100 Stefan Fritsch <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > from a cursory glance at mod_request and apreq, it seems that > mod_request offers a subset of the functionality of apreq. Graham, is > that correct? > > If we aim for inclusion of apreq some time in 2.4.x, it may be a good > idea to not add another API for the same thing. Maybe we could > document that mod_request is already deprecated? If it ain't broke ... IIRC mod_request is a simpler API to work with than apreq, and as you also say ... > Removing it now would be a shame because mod_auth_form depends on it. ... it has existing applications. -1 to deprecating it unless you have compelling technical reasons. We can remove it at a later date, but if so we should first provide the compatible API through apreq. -- Nick Kew
