On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:21:44 +0000 Joe Orton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 03:38:19PM +0000, Nick Kew wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:26:00 +0000 > > Joe Orton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 03:42:07AM +0000, Nick Kew wrote: > > > > Feel free to fix issues you find. That's the advantage of having it > > > > under > > > > change control @apache.org. > > > > > > I don't have time/inclination, thanks. If nobody has any interest in > > > maintaining this code, why has it been added to the tree? The ASF is > > > not a dumping ground for dead code. > > > > > > Regards, Joe > > > > Discussed last month in http://marc.info/?t=131828437700001 > > The "DIY, sucker" The what???? > ASF. So, again, why do we have it in the tree? Because when I suggested it in the thread referenced, there was a consensus in favour. Or do you want to deny mod_proxy_html to anyone whose pages use charsets other than ASCII or UTF-8? -- Nick Kew
