On 24 Nov 2011, at 12:39 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > Whoops! No it doesn't: it's just REMOTE_ADDR that features in CGI. > Objection-in-principle to wrowe's suggestion withdrawn! > > How about, we make a clear break with possible confusion by > dropping remote_ip altogether? It has wrowe's desired effect > of forcing anyone who uses remote_ip to make a decision over > what semantics are in fact needed. > > Appropriate Terminology Suggestion: > > Object Protocol Remote Name > ------ -------- ------ ---- > request_rec HTTP Client client_ip > conn_rec TCP Peer peer_ip
Sounds sensible, +1. Regards, Graham --
