On 12/2/2011 5:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,

where are we WRT 2.4?


Blockers:

mod_proxy_scgi.c needs to be fixed for compilation with C89 (easy)


The only blocker left in STATUS is this:

   * Modules that are not ready for production use must be removed.
     The same for modules without documentation.

I think we have already removed the obvious candidates WRT maturity.
About documentation, docs/STATUS has this:

- modules docs
     - the follwing modules added since 2.2 lack documentation
         - mod_watchdog
         - mod_heartbeat
         - mod_heartmonitor
         - mod_lbmethod_heartbeat
         - mod_socache_dbm
         - mod_socache_memcache
         - mod_socache_shmcb

Do we want to remove any of these modules?

I suspect a single doc for "mod_socache" would probably be appropriate.

I was reading http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/mod_slotmem_shm.html
and am rather fluxored that the authors apparently don't know the definition
of the word "anonymous" shared memory.  And there is a brand new syntax if
users want log-root-relative paths?

Why would slotmem throw away 15 years of filename argument conventions?

IMHO this must be fixed before we call it GA.  Whether that happens before
a 2.4.0 beta doesn't bother me.



Reply via email to