On 21 Dec 2011, at 5:48 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > Ahh. Thanks for the pointer. Missed that it got set as a Warning header. I > thought > that this string got logged :-). Hence my confusion. > Anyway shouldn't we #define 299 to a selfspeaking name like other HTTP codes > such that > this is recognized faster by the code reader?
We currently don't (mod_cache being the biggest place we use warnings), but you're right, we should. Ideally I'd like an API to set and test for warning codes, something like: AP_DECLARE(void) ap_set_warning(request_rec *r, int code, const char *message); AP_DECLARE(int) ap_is_warning(request_rec *r, int code); Regards, Graham --
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
