On Jan 11, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Things look stable.
>> Things look good.
>> Things look happy.
>>
>> Sooooo are we ready to finally make this happen??
>> I offer to RM.
>
> Only outstanding issue from last series of thread I am aware of is
> windows ssl socket reuse thing that causes sporadic empty responses.
>
> I don't know how we'd communicate that to early windows adopters
> outside of e.g. the apachelounge community.
>
Same way we did with 1.3.0 maybe?
"At present, the Win95/NT port of Apache is not
as stable as the UNIX version. Further releases of the 1.3.x tree
will bring the Win95/NT port closer to parity."
