On 1/17/2012 2:07 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > * Are we committed to providing the -deps for 2.4's lifetime, or would > we doc it with some weasel language?
I'm +1 for dropping -deps, but you knew that ;-) > * Does anyone care if we're not committed to it and just change the > doc when we change our mind and stop providing a deps tarball? No... we need some doc to help users. Looking at the users@ list has been instructive. I really think we need 2.4.0-beta to iron out how hard it is now for users to adopt this package, and what we have to document in order to remedy that complexity.
