On 2/6/2012 5:19 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > On 2/5/2012 1:10 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> How about >> >> 1. deprecating --with-included-apr syntax for... >> >> 2. --build-apr=/path syntax, default of '--build-apr=srcdir/apr' where >> and when srclib/apr exists. If they would rather check out httpd, apr >> and apr-util in parallel, it will be easy enough to choose something >> like --build-apr=../apr-1.4.5 > > Can we be sure that the configure script will continue to pass > parameters as it does today to these "sub" configure scripts, too?
I thought that would be implicit ;-) > Also (dare I ask), but where did we end up on the PCRE discussion? You have dared. I don't know. Perhaps follow the same pragma as above?
