On 2/15/2012 2:49 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: > > How did "timing issues" not affect the old hack, and why not use the old > "known to work" > hack for at least AcceptFilter none, up until some better fix is found? If > that fix is > found and cannot be implemented till 2.next, then 2.next it is.
That answer's easy. The old hack was ~1k-2k LoC, the entire original Windows 95 implementation. The new hack is some ~50-100 LoC, but as usual there are side effects of the change we have not yet tracked down. Yes it will affect adoption, and that is not a reason to hold up further progress towards release. How many people refuse a .0 release anyways? The release is what it is.
