I think we should handle 2.4 as RTC; Develop on trunk, propose backports to 2.4 via STATUS.
On Feb 25, 2012, at 1:17 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > Hi all, > > Is "The 2.4.x branch is still CTR" still true? > > From STATUS: > > CURRENT RELEASE NOTES: > > * Forward binary compatibility is expected of Apache 2.4.x releases, such > that no MMN major number changes will occur after 2.4.1. Such changes can > only be made in the trunk. > > * All commits to branches/2.4.x must be reflected in SVN trunk, > as well, if they apply. Logical progression is commit to trunk > then merge into branches/2.4.x, as applicable. The 2.4.x branch is > still CTR. > > Regards, > Graham > -- >
