Will do Gun. Thanks for the feedback. Like this in the future (or as an attachment - although I assumed (my error) you would cut/paste into a "notebook" - which is how I clear up formats I cannot read).
In any case I hope you know what you need to know - I was not sure which one was needing testing. Unfortunately I am still fighting with perl, and getting extra mods installed. AIX 6.1 TYL7 does know have the ability to have a TAP interface, so that has taken care of a few modules - but I am really wondering how well perl mods have been tested for portability if they MUST have things that you might not want to have active in a secured production environment. Just my gut feeling - no comment on the testing process. On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Guenter Knauf <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 21.03.2012 19:45, schrieb Michael Felt: > > Unfortunately - 2.4.2 is a nogo... >> >> Same compiler warning messages, install and then ... >> >> Installation Summary >> -------------------- >> Name Level Part Event Result >> ------------------------------**------------------------------** >> ------------------- >> ASF.httpd.rte 2.4.2.0 USR APPLY >> SUCCESS >> ASF.httpd.man.en_US 2.4.2.0 USR APPLY >> SUCCESS >> ASF.httpd.rte 2.4.2.0 ROOT APPLY >> SUCCESS >> ASF.httpd.man.en_US 2.4.2.0 ROOT APPLY >> SUCCESS >> root@x103:[/data/prj/httpd-2.**4.x]/opt/httpd/sbin/apachectl -t >> httpd: Syntax error on line 143 of /etc/httpd/httpd.conf: Cannot load >> /opt/httpd/libexec/mod_mpm_**worker.so into server: rtld: 0712-001 Symbol >> ap_fatal_signal_setup was referenced\n from module >> > sure! The patch is only in trunk for now - once confirmed all is well we > will propose a packport to 2.4.2 ;-) > btw. I would appreciate if you could post in plain-text format since then > your compiler/build outputs are a lot easier to read ... ;-) > > thanks, Gün. > > >
