On 4/16/2012 8:16 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:35 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 4/9/2012 11:30 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >>> >>> The patch does have value to a limited number of applications. I even went >>> as far as to put caviats in the docs, and a see-docs note to the directive >>> cmd commentary. I hope it dissuades the casual user from throwing it on >>> there >>> unless they know it won't corrupt their app and know it solves their bug. >>> >>> Please reconsider your veto. I agree that it -should not- occur in any >>> real world scenario. But there are unreal scenarios of server configs >>> and third party modules which spend minutes, not seconds, tearing down on >>> shutdown. Those are the bugs. But users just want some help and I think >>> this patch is some help in rare cases. Disabled by default and won't be >>> used by much of anyone, we hope. I'll revert (yet again) if you really >>> want to make a case that we should never support this, even as a workaround. >> >> Gregg, and Jeff and company, if this is reviewed and everyone is happy with >> an end result, I'd like to ensure 2.4.2 compatibility and get tagging. > > If you're out of bandwidth I can handle the T&R&Nag today or tomorrow, > after doing some testing of 2.3.7-dev with httpd 2.4.3-dev (and double > checking with 2.0 and 2.2).
I got to the same point... needing to look at this against 2.4.3-dev tree. If you are happy, please don't hesitate to T&R! Not sure if I could beat you to a tag, but for sure I'll make several hours for testing and voting here this week. [I've had most of trunk/ in test for some time now.]
