Hi again Guenter, I based the patch on the old 2003 patch (http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=106150997309208&w=2) that you said looked harmless.
Anyhow, exactly how do you want it to be solved? Since I have not worked with configure scripts before all help is appreciated Kind Regards, Henrik On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 17:36 +0200, Guenter Knauf wrote: > Hi Henrik, > Am 18.04.2012 09:55, schrieb Henrik Strand: > > I've just added a patch for > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51257 > > > > Does my company need to sign some kind of legal contract in order for > > you to use the patch? > I dont think so since the patch is small. > > However I'm not fine with this patch; its only another hack which might > work, but IMO is the wrong approach. We need someone beeing good with > configure writing and then implement it the usual way so that --host > works (which I just tested and at least with 2.22 it does not work: > configure accepts it and makes all tests with the prefix, but finally > make uses unprefixed gcc). When we are going to fix this it should be > this way as configure is designed for, and not just another hack. > > Gün. > >
