You need to specify a pool size. Also ask on the users list. Thanks,
Andrew C. Oliver On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Bongjae Chang <bongjae.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Reindl, > > Thank you for the link. > > When I read the link, it also said "Faulty scenarios would be like > filedescriptor leak, server not being > execute close() on socket leading to pile up of close_wait sockets". > > I raised the very same issue(mod_proxy's backend connection which has been > already closed). > > Thanks! > > Regards, > Bongjae Chang > > > > > On 5/25/12 6:01 PM, "Reindl Harald" <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > >> >> >>Am 25.05.2012 10:52, schrieb Bongjae Chang: >>>>> Is the watcher thread which is going through all of the connections >>>>> looking to see if they have been closed by the peer only solution? >>>> >>>> There is no thread. >>> >>> I see.. then I think that it will be useful if mod_proxy will support >>>the >>> feature later(just my opinion). >> >>as far as i understand this is normal TCP behavior for reusing sockets >> >>http://blogs.technet.com/b/janelewis/archive/2010/03/09/explaining-close-w >>ait.aspx >> > >
