On Jul 13, 2012, at 3:57 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Thursday 12 July 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> To be clear, yes, the intent was to ensure that all patches >> from trunk got into 2.4 before we re-merge. My expectation is >> that the event optimizations will eventually find their way >> into 2.4.x (and not be part of 2.6.x) and so getting them back >> into trunk allows people to work them. Except for main >> branches, most side-branches just don't get worked. >> >> So my plan is: >> >> 1. We push all trunk event improvements into 2.4.x >> 2. We release 2.4.3 >> 3. We re-merge the event optims back to trunk. > > FWIW, I would prefer not to delay 2.4.3 for that. >
Delay 2.4.3 for what?
