On 7/14/2012 9:42 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: > On 7/14/2012 9:35 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: >> On 7/13/2012 7:31 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >>> I dont care about EOL'ed XP users needing to provision it, but what is the >>> group >>> concensus about having 2008 (original release) users pre provision it? >> >> Neither XP or 2003 are EOL'd, not till April 2014 IIRC. >> > Correction, it still has security support till then and do not expect them to > go away just > yet.
But we aren't concerned with providing 'new software' for any such legacy environment. I don't think 2.2 is dead, yet. > Something that I have noticed with people who install with the .msi, it would > be nice to > have an upgrade option. Many newbs are fearful of uninstalling to upgrade > since they do > not know it will leave behind and not overwrite what the want saved and not > overwritten. Agreed.
