On 08/11/2012 02:37 PM, humbed...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: humbedooh
> Date: Sat Aug 11 12:37:15 2012
> New Revision: 1371932
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1371932&view=rev
> Log:
> Comment
> 
> Modified:
>     httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> 
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1371932&r1=1371931&r2=1371932&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Sat Aug 11 12:37:15 2012
> @@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
>       2.4.x patch: Trunk patch works (*provided the authz provider gets 
> backported)
>       +1: humbedooh, rjung
>       rjung: docs missing?
> +     humbedooh: It's in the 2.4 docs already, but commented out, as with a 
> lot 
> +                of other functions that were never actually made. It's a 
> mess ;)
>  
>     * mod_auth_digest: respect DefaultRuntimeDir for its
>                        unconfigurable shared memory file
> 
> 
I'll be quick, as I'm needed elsewhere. Rainer, the mod_lua docs are a
bit of a mess, since the original implementation of mod_lua was not done
properly. A lot of "Gee, if only we had this" documentation made it past
to the 2.4 docs, and have since been commented out. As a result, there's
no real patch from trunk to 2.4, since the documentation already exists
in both documents, in different forms.

I'll personally make sure that whenever something does get backported,
the documentation is then made up-to-date. I hope that's good enough :)
Mostly, this just involves uncommenting a section.

With regards,
Daniel.

Reply via email to