On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > I cannot think of one good reason why we've been doing the below... > I any case, I think vhosts inheriting these structs is a pretty > nasty bug, as well as memory hog...
Hi Jim Is one possible use case for this defining balancers outside of vhosts, and then using them in multiple vhosts? (Personally, I hate this feature, it clutters up unrelated balancer sets on balancer-manager). Cheers Tom
