On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:01 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Author: jorton > Date: Tue Dec 18 09:01:02 2012 > New Revision: 1423353 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1423353&view=rev > Log: > * modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ftp.c: Fill in APLOGNO. > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/log-message-tags/next-number > httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ftp.c > > Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/log-message-tags/next-number > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/log-message-tags/next-number?rev=1423353&r1=1423352&r2=1423353&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > --- httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/log-message-tags/next-number (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/log-message-tags/next-number Tue Dec 18 > 09:01:02 2012 > @@ -1 +1 @@ > -2410 > +2411 > > Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ftp.c > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ftp.c?rev=1423353&r1=1423352&r2=1423353&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ftp.c (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ftp.c Tue Dec 18 09:01:02 > 2012 > @@ -1465,7 +1465,7 @@ static int proxy_ftp_handler(request_rec > > "EPSV attempt to connect to %pI failed - firewall/NAT?", &epsv_addr)); > } > else { > - ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_TRACE1, 0, r, > APLOGNO() > + ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_TRACE1, 0, r, > APLOGNO(02410) > "connected data socket to %pI", > &epsv_addr); >
My understanding is that we don't maintain messages numbers for TRACE messages, so the APLOGNO() could have been simply deleted. (I see several mod_lua messages that don't follow this pattern.) > connect = 1; > } > > > -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/
