Hi Daniel. Thank you for your comment.
> I have tried to compile and install mod_mruby on my own machine to test > it, but there are too many compiler errors for it to work :( In > particular, you have a lot of declarations after statements in your > code, which is not C90 compliant, and needs fixing. There are also some Did you built mruby? If you don't build murky, you try to build by bellow commands. - mruby and mod_mruby build git clone git://github.com/matsumoto-r/mod_mruby.git cd mod_mruby git submodule init git submodule update cd murby rake cd .. ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache2222/bin/apxs --with-apachectl=/usr/local/apache2222/bin/apachectl make make install - mod_mruby settings cp -p test/test.mrb /usr/local/apache2222/htdocs/. vi /usr/local/apache2222/conf/httpd.con (snip) LoadModule mruby_module modules/mod_mruby.so AddHandler mruby-script .mrb (snip) /usr/local/apache2222/bin/apachectl start - mod_mruby test http://youraddress/test.mrb > errors that force the source code to use 2.2 standards when compiling it > for 2.4 or 2.5 - this also needs to be addressed: > > ap_mrb_connection.c:31 says: #ifdef __APACHE24__ > This should probably change to: #if (AP_SERVER_MINORVERSION_NUMBER > 2) it's smart! Thanks. Now, configure script figure out apache version from apachectl. > I am very interested in how you got to the benchmark results you did. > Statistically speaking, Ruby is a very slow language compared to Lua > (and in particular LuaJIT which is extremely fast - if you attend my > talk at ACNA, I'll show you just how fast ;) ). Which optimizations did > you make to the configuration? Which scopes and code caching options did > you use for your testing? Did you test mod_lua fom the 2.4 branch or the > trunk? I want to attend your talk about mod_lua and lua JIT. I'm getting really excited. > I'd also be interested in an English version of your slides, as there > may be things to learn from it :) > > We embrace competition here at Apache, so mod_mruby is a most welcome > addition, however I'd really like to get my hands on a working copy, so > I can test it out and see what it can really do. One advantage that I > could see from the source code is the ability to hook into the logging > part of httpd, which is something mod_lua currently lacks. I did not see > any filter hooks though - is this something you plan to add, or did I OK. I'll write a paper about mod_mruby in English, and present my work in an international symposium in a few month. Regards, Ryosuke. ---- MATSUMOTO Ryosuke < matsu1229 at gmail.com > http://blog.matsumoto-r.jp/ On 2013/01/20, at 21:31, Daniel Gruno <rum...@cord.dk> wrote: > On 01/20/2013 10:31 AM, MATSUMOTO Ryosuke wrote: >> Hi, all >> >> I'm Ryosuke MATSUMOTO, a Ph.D. student at Okabe Lab, Network >> Media Group Department of Intelligence Science and Technology >> Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University in Japan. >> >> My English is not very good, but I am studying at the moment to communicate >> developers of the world. >> >> I have been developing mod_mruby and ngx_mruby from Apr 2012. >> >> mod_mruby is a web server extension mechanism using embeddable >> scripting language mruby which has been attracting attention now. >> >> mod_mruby abstract: >> ----- >> As the increase of services using Web servers, the number of incidents >> also is increasing rapidly. In order to solve those problems, it is necessary >> to extend a functionality of a Web server software. >> >> In case of using Apache, developers are required high coding skill of C >> language and internal specifications of Apache in order to extend the >> functionality of it. >> >> The development of a web server extension requires some high skills, and >> the maintainability is low since that extension need to compile a code. >> >> Therefore, we propose mod_mruby that is a web server extension mechanism >> using embeddable scripting language mruby which has been attracting >> attention now. mod_mruby allows to extend the functionality of Apache >> easily by implementing a mruby script. mod_mruby provides an interface >> to hook and execute any mruby scripts in the various phases of processing >> requests inside Apache. When hooking mruby scripts, mruby scripts can >> process the data of processing requests inside Apache, taking advantage >> of the characteristics of a embeddable scripting language for C language. >> >> We have designed that mod_mruby run at high speed by sharing the data >> of state transition and the extension library of mruby by multiple >> mruby scripts >> and using only different byte code each mruby script. >> >> Many developers can implement a web server extension easily by mod_mruby >> in cooperation with coding style of mruby which is the same as object >> oriented >> programming ruby which is widely used by web developers. >> ----- >> >> see slide share about mod_mruby architecture and performance compared with >> mod_lua, mod_per, and a module written by C language.(Sorry in Japanese) >> >> http://www.slideshare.net/matsumoto_r/mrubyweb >> > <snip> > > Hi, Matsumoto, > > Your project does indeed look interesting, and for those more accustomed > to Ruby, perhaps this is a good alternative. > > I have tried to compile and install mod_mruby on my own machine to test > it, but there are too many compiler errors for it to work :( In > particular, you have a lot of declarations after statements in your > code, which is not C90 compliant, and needs fixing. There are also some > errors that force the source code to use 2.2 standards when compiling it > for 2.4 or 2.5 - this also needs to be addressed: > > ap_mrb_connection.c:31 says: #ifdef __APACHE24__ > This should probably change to: #if (AP_SERVER_MINORVERSION_NUMBER > 2) > > I am very interested in how you got to the benchmark results you did. > Statistically speaking, Ruby is a very slow language compared to Lua > (and in particular LuaJIT which is extremely fast - if you attend my > talk at ACNA, I'll show you just how fast ;) ). Which optimizations did > you make to the configuration? Which scopes and code caching options did > you use for your testing? Did you test mod_lua fom the 2.4 branch or the > trunk? > > I'd also be interested in an English version of your slides, as there > may be things to learn from it :) > > We embrace competition here at Apache, so mod_mruby is a most welcome > addition, however I'd really like to get my hands on a working copy, so > I can test it out and see what it can really do. One advantage that I > could see from the source code is the ability to hook into the logging > part of httpd, which is something mod_lua currently lacks. I did not see > any filter hooks though - is this something you plan to add, or did I > just miss it? > > With regards, > Daniel.
