Hmmm... The other idea is to keep it as it was, stick pconf back in conf->pool but just always create a sub-pool before conf->pool is used. This *looks* like it removes the need for a mutex...
On May 15, 2013, at 7:37 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > Just wondering if we also have a problem with the pool > as well... if base doesn't have a proxy, we don't have > the subpool. > > BTW, wondering if instead of leaking proxy_mutex we > could set ps->mutex = proxy_mutex in mod_proxy.c when > we merge. We could then make proxy_mutex static...? > > On May 15, 2013, at 7:27 PM, Graham Leggett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 16 May 2013, at 1:25 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Ugg. You're 100% right. We need to create a global. >> >> Here is one I made earlier: http://svn.apache.org/r1482859 >> >> Regards, >> Graham >> -- >> >
