[email protected] wrote: > Author: jim > Date: Thu Jun 13 15:30:01 2013 > New Revision: 1492706 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1492706 > Log: > other possible backports > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1492706&r1=1492705&r2=1492706&view=diff > ==============================================================================
> @@ -211,7 +211,29 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: > trunk patch: > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1482522 > 2.4.x patch: trunk patch works modulo CHANGES and ap_mmn > +1: > - > + > + * mod_proxy: support Unix domain sockets > + trunk patch: > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1451633 > + > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1451905 > + > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1451921 > + > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1452259 > + > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1453981 > + 2.4.x patch: trunk patch works modulo CHANGES and ap_mmn > + +1: > + > + * mod_proxy: Ensure network errors detected by the proxy are returned as > + 504 Gateway Timout as opposed to 502 Bad Gateway > + trunk patch: > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1480058 > + 2.4.x patch: trunk patch works modulo CHANGES > + +1: This one is still disputed and we are waiting for Roy's final judgement about what is correct here. So I would oppose backporting it at this point of time. Regards Rüdiger
