On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:28 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net>wrote:
> Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > +/-1 > [ ] Release 2.0.65 as the final 2.0 series package > > TIA! > [+1] Release 2.0.65 as the final 2.0 series package Tested 64-bit builds on FreeBSD 9 Compares favorably with 2.0.64. 2.0.64 vs. 2.0.65: Test Summary Report ------------------- -t/apache/byterange7.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 24 Failed: 8) - Failed tests: 13-19, 23 t/apache/pr17629.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 1) Failed test: 4 t/apache/pr43939.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 1) @@ -570,15 +553,9 @@ Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 58 tests but ran 50. t/modules/dav.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 1) Failed test: 16 -t/modules/include.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 87 Failed: 1) - Failed test: 66 -t/modules/rewrite.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 29 Failed: 1) - Failed test: 24 -t/security/CVE-2011-3368-rewrite.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 1) - Failed test: 3 -Files=108, Tests=3246, 91 wallclock secs ( 2.00 usr 0.33 sys + 36.73 cusr 9.00 csys = 48.05 CPU) +Files=108, Tests=3246, 92 wallclock secs ( 1.91 usr 0.33 sys + 36.18 cusr 8.55 csys = 46.97 CPU) Result: FAIL -Failed 8/108 test programs. 27/3246 subtests failed. +Failed 4/108 test programs. 16/3246 subtests failed.
