On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Stefan Fritsch <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 July 2013, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > I don't like all that much having to duplicate the “official” hook > > (in particular the ap_make_full_path() call), but I guess it's > > better than what used to be there, and it's only two lines. > > Yes, that's the price to pay for the more flexible hook which supports > additional use cases. I think these two lines are acceptable. > I think this issue was the original objection to solving the problem with this particular API (voiced or unvoiced), but I agree that the additional use cases make it worthwhile. I guess "it seems to work" in the earlier e-mail is the validation that the API is sufficient for MPM-ITK. > Cheers, > Stefan > -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/
